Puerto Rico Tour Company: Denies Service to Jewish American, Citing "Free Palestine"

The company’s website reportedly became inaccessible following the incident.

Relevant sentence: “However, following the incident, its website reportedly became inaccessible, though it’s unclear if this was intentional.”

Why I think this is the case: This represents a change in the company’s online presence/behavior after the controversy, though the article notes it’s unclear whether this was an intentional response to the backlash or a technical issue.

No other disciplinary actions from your list were found. The article does not mention anyone being fired, deported, denied entry to the US, arrested, suspended, resigning, having funding pulled, or facing formal disciplinary action. However, the article does note that the company faces reputational damage, negative reviews, calls for boycotts, and potential legal scrutiny.

Quote about Canary Mission:

“The incident has drawn significant attention online, with X posts from accounts like Canary Mission and Yeshiva World News sharing the story, labeling it as blatant antisemitism.”


Social Media Post

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Canary Mission (@canarymission)


Full Article

Unable to display the original PDF hosted on BlackNest. Download it instead.

Link to the original article